It’s not without a bit of odd coincidence that our company’s scheduled blog posts for the month of February are set to take on the theme “Demonstrating Value: Transparency and Accountability in Client Services”. . . when one of the biggest executive compensation flaps in recent Knoxville history is unfolding right now.
At almost this very time two years ago (January 2010), I wrote a blog post, “The Reputational Fallout of Compensation Run Amok,” prompted at the time by a Barron’s article on the topic of out-of-control executive compensation on Wall Street and Washington’s reaction to it.
Whether an organization is public or private-sector, for-profit or non-profit, executive compensation disclosures can take a real toll on relationships with stakeholders, if compensation levels as well as policies aren’t within some reasonable range of public expectations, particularly given the scale of the organization and the context of its work performance.
Of course, you can’t please everyone on this topic. Some folks misguidedly think anyone working in the non-profit sector shouldn’t make more than $50K a year. Non-profits that seek to operate with the performance-driven approach of highly competitive companies generally have to pay quite well to attract commensurate talent in keeping with expectations.
As with practically everything else that can impact public attitudes and opinions, balance is the name of the game.
Board decisions should be made with an underlying expectation that all information is subject to public disclosure and scrutiny and should let that knowledge serve as some form of guidance on executive compensation parameters.

![422[1]](http://marybethwest.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/4221.jpg)
![MH910221032[1]](http://marybethwest.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/MH91022103211-150x150.jpg)




![MC900090409[1]](http://marybethwest.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/MC9000904091.jpg)
![arms wrapped around]](http://marybethwest.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/arms-wrapped-around-270x300.jpg)
